Watch Akshay’s sanitary pad ad then: Siddhant on Animal criticism of Animal Movie

Sonali Saha
2 Min Read

Siddhant Karnick Addresses Criticism Surrounding “Animal” Film’s Alleged Regressive Messaging

Actor Siddhant Karnick, recognized for his role as Ranbir Kapoor’s character’s brother-in-law in the movie “Animal,” has responded to the film’s critique regarding its purported regressive messaging. In a recent statement, Karnick addressed the criticism by drawing a comparison to public service advertisement narratives and emphasized a nuanced perspective on the matter.

Join Now
Whatsapp Group
Whatsapp Channel
Telegram channel

“Animal,” a highly anticipated film, faced criticism for its portrayal, which some viewers deemed regressive in its messaging. Karnick offered a contrasting viewpoint, suggesting that viewers exposed to Akshay Kumar’s educational advertisements on sanitary pads might perceive certain aspects of “Animal” differently.

“To those who want to see…public message ads…watch Akshay Kumar educate us on sanitary pads and watch far gory things…about what smoking does to you,” remarked Siddhant Karnick. He further elaborated, stating that the graphic content displayed in public service announcements about the harmful effects of smoking could be perceived as more intense than what is depicted in “Animal.”

Karnick’s commentary sheds light on the disparity in public perception and sensitivity towards different forms of messaging across various platforms. He implies that while “Animal” may have faced criticism for its content, the level of explicitness in public service advertisements addressing health concerns might contain more graphic imagery than the film’s portrayal.

The actor’s statement opens the door to discussions regarding the interpretation of messaging in entertainment media versus educational campaigns, advocating for a nuanced understanding of content and its varying impacts on audiences.

Siddhant Karnick’s remarks come amid ongoing debates surrounding cinematic content and its societal influence, prompting conversations about the multifaceted nature of messaging and its reception by diverse audience groups.

As “Animal” continues to be scrutinized for its narrative choices, Karnick’s perspective serves as a catalyst for broader discussions on the perception of messaging across different media platforms.

Share This Article
Hi, my name is Sonali, I am a content writer specializing in the topics of Relationships, Travel, News, Bollywood, and More.
Leave a comment